monopoly Ordinance a is
convicted
of
a breach of the
law and sentenced to pay
+125 and to forfeit
fine of opium
to
a considerable
amount, half of
gres
the fine
to the crown, half to
the monopolist
as well as
а
531
by Mr Bridges . The Crown
therefore
is not represented
at all. If the decision be
reversed the brown will
lose its half of
So there
the #125.
or is there not
C+
나
any er
objection to the Attorney er
General (Mr. Anstey) acting
the circums
the whale of
the
Opium.
Ja
for A under
The Crown has therefore
much smaller interest in
the ultimate decision
the
colist.
Jo 2.
matter than the monopo
a
removes
the conviction
by certiorari to the Supreme Court and retains Mr Constey. The monopolist is represented
circumstances!
I submitted confidentially
the present
case to the
Chief Justice for his advice -
on which I shall act in
the special
occasion involved,
but I request your
instructions.
as to the
general question.
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.